Модельно-ориентированная разработка серьезных игр и серьезные игры с ориентированным на пользователя дизайном в последнее десятилетие: обзор

В этой статье представлен обзор литературы по автоматической генерации кода для серьезных игр, ориентированных на пользователя. Мы решили разделить исследование на две части: одна часть посвящена серьезным играм с модельно-ориентированным проектированием, а другая – серьезным играм, ориентированным на пользователя. Статья представляет собой продолжение статьи, представленной на CONISOFT 20, в которой был представлен систематический обзор литературы 5-летней давности к моменту написания. Систематический обзор литературы, проведенный в данной статье, охватывает десятилетие с января 2012 года по июнь 2022 года. Основная цель – выявить результаты, которые помогает снизить затраты и время на разработку программного обеспечения для серьезных игр. Общий вывод заключается в том, что еще предстоит проделать работу, чтобы объединить серьезные игры, ориентированные на пользователя, и автоматическую генерацию. В статье указаны соответствующие публикации, а также представлен обзор областей исследований и мест публикации. Кроме того, исследования были классифицированы в соответствии с общими целями, методами и подходами. Наконец, представлены проблемы и возможности для будущих исследований и разработок.

1. Catalano C.E., Luccini A.M., Mortara M. Guidelines for an effective design of serious games. International Journal of Serious Games, vol. 1, issue 1, 2014, 13 p.

2. Frasca G. Juego, videojuego y creación de sentido. Una introducción. Comunicación: revista Internacional de Comunicación Audiovisual, Publicidad y Estudios Culturales, vol. 1, no. 7, 2009, pp. 37-44 (in Spanish).

3. Hanes L, Stone R. A model of heritage content to support the design and analysis of video games for history education. Journal of Computers in Education, vol. 6, issue 4, 2019, pp. 587-612. doi:10.1007/s40692-018-0120-2

4. Nielsen J. Usability 101: Introduction to Usability. Nielsen Norman Group. Published 2012. URL: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/, accessed April 7, 2020.

5. Blow J. Game Development: Harder Than You Think. Queue, vol. 1, no. 10, 2004, pp. 28-37.

6. Reyno E.M., Á Carsí Cubel J. Automatic prototyping in model-driven game development. Computers in Entertainment, vol. 7, issue 2, 2009, pp. 1-9.

7. Ruiz-Rube I., Dodero J.M., Ruiz M. Ingeniería Dirigida por Modelos como soporte a la gestión de procesos software. Trabajo incluido en las actas de las II Jornadas Predoctorales de la Escuela Superior de Ingenieria. 2010. 4 p.

8. Kitchenham B., Pearl Brereton O. et al. Systematic literature reviews in software engineering - A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, vol. 51, issue 1, 2009, pp. 7-15.

9. Hong J., Suh E., Kim S.J. Context-aware systems: A literature review and classification. Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, issue 4, 2009, pp. 8509–8522.

10. Calderón A., Boubeta-Puig J., Ruiz M. MEdit4CEP-Gam: A model-driven approach for user-friendly gamification design, monitoring and code generation in CEP-based systems. Information and Software Technology, vol. 95, 2018, pp. 238-264.

11. Pérez-Berenguer D., García-Molina J. A standard-based architecture to support learning interoperability: A practical experience in gamification. Software: Practice and Experience, vol. 48, issue 6, 2018, pp. 1238-1268.

12. Teipel S., König A. et al. Use of nonintrusive sensor-based information and communication technology for real-world evidence for clinical trials in dementia. Alzheimer's & Dementia, vol. 14, issue 9, 2018, pp. 1216-1231.

13. P. de Lope R., Medina-Medina N. et al. A novel UML-based methodology for modeling adventure-based educational games. Entertainment Computing, vol. 38, article no. 100429, pp. 1-19.

14. Antunes A., Madeira R.N. PLAY - Model-based Platform to Support Therapeutic Serious Games Design. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 198, 2022, pp. 211-218.

15. Pérez F., Lapeña R. et al. Topic modeling for feature location in software models: Studying both code generation and interpreted models. Information and Software Technology, 140, 2021, article no. 106676.

16. Martínez-Pernía D., Núñez-Huasaf J. et al. Using game authoring platforms to develop screen-based simulated functional assessments in persons with executive dysfunction following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 74, 2017, pp. 71-84.

17. Oberdörfer S., Latoschik M.E. Predicting learning effects of computer games using the Gamified Knowledge Encoding Model. Entertainment Computing, vol. 32, article no. 100315, 39 p.

18. Padilla-Zea N., Medina-Medina N. et al. PLAGER-VG: platform for managing educational multiplayer video games. Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 77, issue 2, 2018, pp. 2115-2152.

19. Thomas A., Menassa C.C., Kamat V.R. Lightweight and adaptive building simulation (LABS) framework for integrated building energy and thermal comfort analysis. Building Simulation, vol. 10, issue 6, 2017, pp. 1023-1044.

20. Reinkensmeyer D.J., Burdet E. et al. Computational neurorehabilitation: Modeling plasticity and learning to predict recovery. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 13, issue 1, 2016, pp. 1-25.

21. Torrens P.M. Intertwining agents and environments. Environmental Earth Sciences, vol. 74, issue 10, 2015, pp. 7117-7131.

22. Muñoz J.E., Gouveia E.R. et al. Physiolab - A multivariate physiological computing toolbox for ECG, EMG and EDA signals: A case of study of cardiorespiratory fitness assessment in the elderly population. Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 77, issue 9, 2018, pp. 11511-11546.

23. Kritikos K., Plexousakis D., Paternò F. Task Model-Driven Realization of Interactive Application Functionality through Services. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, vol. 3, issue 4, 2014.

24. Feron H., Lehmann A., Josse F. A generic architecture and validation considerations for tactical combat casualty care serious games. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology, vol. 12, issue 3, 2015, pp. 319-334.

25. Fanini B., Pagano A., Ferdani D. A novel immersive VR game model for recontextualization in virtual environments: The µVRmodel. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, vol. 2, no. 2, 2018, article no. 20, 22 p.

26. Mestadi W., Nafil K. et al. An Assessment of Serious Games Technology: Toward an Architecture for Serious Games Design. International Journal of Computer Games Technolog, vol. 2018, 2018, article no. 9834565, 17 p.

27. Zarraonandia T., Diaz P., Aedo I. Using combinatorial creativity to support end-user design of digital games. Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 76, issue 6, 2017, pp. 9073-9098.

28. Bozzon A., Fraternali P. et al. Modeling CrowdSourcing Scenarios in Socially-Enabled Human Computation Applications. Journal on Data Semantics, vol. 3, issue 3, 2014, pp. 169-188.

29. Ferreira C., Maia L.F. et al. Modelling and transposition of location-based games. Entertainment Computing, vol. 30, 2018, article no. 100295.

30. Van Rozen R. Languages of Games and Play: A Systematic Mapping Study. ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 53, issue 6, 2021, pp. 1-37.

31. Orji R., Mandryk R.L., Vassileva J. Improving the efficacy of games for change using personalization models. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 24, issue 5, 2017, Article no. 32, pp. 1-22.

32. Aleem S., Capretz L.F., Ahmed F. Critical Success Factors to Improve the Game Development Process from a Developer’s Perspective. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, vol. 31, issue 5, 2016, pp. 925-950.

33. Minović M., Milovanović M. et al. Visualisation of student learning model in serious games. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 47, 2015, pp. 98-107.

34. Rumeser D., Emsley M. Design and evaluation of the project and program crashing games. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol. 14, issue 1, 2022, pp. 471-488.

35. Predescu A., Arsene D. et al. A serious gaming approach for crowdsensing in urban water infrastructure with blockchain support. Applied Sciences, vol. 11, issue 4, 2021, pp. 1-32.

36. Furtado L.S., de Souza R.F. et al. Teaching Method for Software Measurement Process Based on Gamification or Serious Games: A Systematic Review of the Literature. International Journal of Computer Games Technology, vol. 2021, 2021, article ID 8873997, 8 p.

37. Ojeda-Castelo J.J., Piedra-Fernandez J.A. et al. KiNEEt: application for learning and rehabilitation in special educational needs. Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 77, issue 18, 2018, pp. 24013-24039.

38. Yamin M.M., Katt B., Nowostawski M. Serious games as a tool to model attack and defense scenarios for cyber-security exercises. Computers & Security, vol. 110, 2021, article no. 102450.

39. Tong T., Guana V. et al. Rapid Deployment and Evaluation of Mobile Serious Games: A Cognitive Assessment Case Study. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 69, 2015, pp. 96-103.

40. Gibson D.C., Webb M.E. Data science in educational assessment. Education and Information Technologies, vol. 20, issue 4, 2015, pp. 697-713.

41. Khalili-Mahani N., de Schutter B. et al. For Whom the Games Toll: A Qualitative and Intergenerational Evaluation of What is Serious in Games for Older Adults. The Computer Games Journal, vol. 9, 2020, pp. 221-244.

42. Rieger C., Majchrzak T.A. Towards the definitive evaluation framework for cross-platform app development approaches. Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 153, 2019, pp. 175-199.

43. Koch J., Gomse M., Schüppstuhl T. Digital game-based examination for sensor placement in context of an Industry 4.0 lecture using the Unity 3D engine - a case study. Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 55, 2021, pp. 563-570.

44. Coghlan A., Carter L. Serious games as interpretive tools in complex natural tourist attractions. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, vol. 42, 2020, pp. 258-265.

45. Carvalho M.B., Bellotti F. et al. An activity theory-based model for serious games analysis and conceptual design. Computers & Education, vol. 87, 2015, pp. 166-181.

46. Johnsen H.M., Fossum M. et al. Teaching clinical reasoning and decision-making skills to nursing students: Design, development, and usability evaluation of a serious game. International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 94, 2016, pp. 39-48.

47. Kiili K., Lainema T. et al. Flow framework for analyzing the quality of educational games. Entertainment Computing, vol. 5, issue 4, 2014, pp. 367-377.

48. Gray S.I., Robertson J. et al. BrainQuest: The use of motivational design theories to create a cognitive training game supporting hot executive function. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 127, 2019, pp. 124-149.

49. Marcucci E., Gatta V., le Pira M. Gamification design to foster stakeholder engagement and behavior change: An application to urban freight transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 118, 2017, pp. 119-132.

50. Xu F., Buhalis D., Weber J. Serious games and the gamification of tourism. Tourism Management, vol. 60, 2017, pp. 244-256.

51. Huang H., Ng K.H. et al. A card-based internet of things game ideation tool for museum context. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, vol. 12, issue 10, 2021, pp. 9229-9240.

52. Vardaxoglou G., Baralou E. Developing a platform for serious gaming: Open innovation through closed innovation. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 15, 2012, pp. 111-121.

53. de Freitas S., Routledge H. Designing leadership and soft skills in educational games: The e-leadership and soft skills educational games design model (ELESS). British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 44, issue 6, 2013, pp. 951-968.

54. van Dooren M.M.M., Siriaraya P. et al. Reflections on the design, implementation, and adoption of a gamified eHealth application in youth mental healthcare. Entertainment Computing, vol. 31, 2019, article no. 100305.

55. Seaborn K., Fels D.I. Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 74, 2015, pp. 14-31.

56. Ahmad N.B., Barakji S.A.R. et al. How to launch a successful video game: A framework. Entertainment Computing, vol. 23, 2017, pp. 1-11.

57. Urh M., Vukovic G. et al. The Model for Introduction of Gamification into E-learning in Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 197, 2015, pp. 388-397.

58. Padilla-Zea N., Gutiérrez F.L. et al. Modeling storytelling to be used in educational video games. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 31, issue 1, 2014, pp. 461-474.

59. Fischinger D., Einramhof P. et al. Hobbit, a care robot supporting independent living at home: First prototype and lessons learned. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 75, 2016, pp. 60-78.

60. Front A., Rieu D. et al. A participative end-user method for multi-perspective business process elicitation and improvement. Software & Systems Modeling, vol. 16, issue 3, 2017, pp. 691-714.

61. Räisänen T., Ypsilanti A. et al. Examining the requirements for an intergenerational learning game. Education and Information Technologies, vol. 19, issue 3, 2014, pp. 531-547.

62. Kourouthanassis P.E., Boletsis C., Lekakos G. Demystifying the design of mobile augmented reality applications. Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 74, issue 3, 2013, pp. 1045-1066.

63. Shahri A., Hosseini M. et al. Engineering Digital Motivation in Businesses: A Modelling and Analysis Framework. Requirements Engineering, vol. 25, 2020, pp. 153-184.

64. Priego-Roche L.M., Front A., Rieu D. A framework for virtual organization requirements. Requirements Engineering, vol. 21, issue 4, 2016, pp. 439-460.

65. Hersh M., Leporini B. Editorial: Serious games, education and inclusion for disabled people. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 49, issue 4, 2018, pp. 587-595.

66. Terras M.M., Boyle E.A. Integrating games as a means to develop e-learning: Insights from a psychological perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 50. issue 3, 2019, pp. 1049-1059.

67. Dimeff L.A., Koerner K. Fulfilling the promise of behavioral health technologies to improve public health impact and reduce public health disparities: A commentary. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, vol. 26, issue 1, 2019, article e12276, pp. 1-4.

68. Peñeñory V.M., Collazos C.A. et al. APRehab: a methodology for serious games design oriented to psychomotor rehabilitation in children with hearing impairments. Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 20, 2021, pp. 255–264.

69. Ramos-Aguiar L.R., Alvarez-Rodriguez F.J. Teaching Emotions in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Through a Computer Program with Tangible Interfaces. IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje, vol. 16, no. 4, 2021, pp. 365-371.

70. Böckle M., Novak J., Bick M. Exploring gamified persuasive system design for energy saving. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, vol. 33, issue 6, 2020, pp. 1337-1356.

71. Wang X, Goh D.H.L. et al. Understanding the determinants of human computation game acceptance: The effects of aesthetic experience and output quality. Online Information Review, Vol. 40 No. 4, 2016, pp. 481-496.

72. Carrión-Toro M., Santorum M. et al. iPlus a user-centered methodology for serious games design. Applied Sciences, vol. 10, issue 24, pp. 1-33.

73. Kondylakis H., Bucur A. et al. Patient empowerment for cancer patients through a novel ICT infrastructure. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 101, 2020, article no. 103342, 14 p.

74. Cano S., Collazos C.A. et al. Towards a methodology for user experience assessment of serious games with children with cochlear implants. Telematics and Informatics, vol. 35, issue 4, 2018, pp. 993-1004.

75. Fanfarelli J.R., McDaniel R., Crossley C. Adapting UX to the design of healthcare games and applications. Entertainment Computing, vol. 28, 2018, pp. 21-31.

76. Fernandez-Cervantes V., Neubauer N. et al. VirtualGym: A kinect-based system for seniors exercising at home. Entertainment Computing, vol. 27, 2018, pp. 60-72.

77. Menghi R., Papetti A., Germani M. Product Service Platform to improve care systems for elderly living at home. Health Policy and Technology, vol. 8, issue 4, 2019, pp. 393-401.

78. Havukainen M., Laine T.H. et al. A Case Study on Co-designing Digital Games with Older Adults and Children: Game Elements, Assets, and Challenges. The Computer Games Journal, vol. 9, 2020, pp. 163–188.

79. O’Connor S., Shuttleworth J. et al. Assessing the perceived realism of agent grouping dynamics for adaptation and simulation. Entertainment Computing, vol. 32, 2019, article no. 100323.

80. Johnson C.M., McIlwain S. et al. Creating a sustainable collaborative consumer health application for chronic disease self-management. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 71, 2017, pp. 198-206.

81. López S., Cervantes J.A. et al. The plausibility of using unmanned aerial vehicles as a serious game for dealing with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. Cognitive Systems Research, vol. 59, 2020, pp. 160-170.

82. Quint F., Sebastian K., Gorecky D. A Mixed-reality Learning Environment. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 75, 2015, pp. 43-48.

83. Koivisto J.M., Haavisto E. et al. Design principles for simulation games for learning clinical reasoning: A design-based research approach. Nurse Education Today, vol. 60, 2018, pp. 114-120.

84. Gerling K.M., Linehan C. et al. Creating wheelchair-controlled video games: Challenges and opportunities when involving young people with mobility impairments and game design experts. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 94, 2016, pp. 64-73.

85. Cinquin P.A., Guitton P., Sauzéon H. Online e-learning and cognitive disabilities: A systematic review. Computers & Education, vol. 130, 2018, pp. 152-167.

86. Aebli A. Tourists’ motives for gamified technology use. Annals of Tourism Research, vol. 78, 2019, article no. 102753.

87. Ingram J., Gaskell P. Searching for meaning: Co-constructing ontologies with stakeholders for smarter search engines in agriculture. Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, issues 90-91, 2019, article no. 100300, pp. 1-13.

88. Scott M.J., Spyridonis F., Ghinea G. Designing for designers: Towards the development of accessible ICT products and services using the VERITAS framework. Computer Standards & Interfaces, vol. 42, 2015, pp. 113-124.

89. Tan J.L., Goh D.H.L. et al. Learning efficacy and user acceptance of a game-based social skills learning environment. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, vol. 9-10, 2016, pp. 1-19.

90. Lokshina I.V., Durkin B.J. Redesigning the Healthcare Model to Address Obesity Problem Using the Integration of Processes and Mobile Technologies: Facing a Worldwide Epidemic in an Innovative Manner. Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 96, issue 4, 2017, pp. 5483-5498.

91. Hocine N., Gouaïch A. et al. Adaptation in serious games for upper-limb rehabilitation: an approach to improve training outcomes. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 25, issue 1, 2015, pp. 65-98.

92. Vayanou M., Ioannidis Y. et al. How to Play Storytelling Games with Masterpieces: From Art Galleries to Hybrid Board Games. Journal of Computers in Education, vol. 6, 2019, pp. pages 79–116.

93. Martinho D., Carneiro J. et al. A systematic review of gamification techniques applied to elderly care. Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 53, 2020, pp. 4863–4901.

94. Palumbo F., la Rosa D. et al. Reliability and human factors in Ambient Assisted Living environments: The DOREMI case study. Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments, vol. 3, issue 3, 2017, pp. 139-157.

95. Ivanov R. Blind-environment interaction through voice augmented objects. Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, vol. 8, issue 4, 2014, pp. 345-365.

96. Tuerk P.W., Schaeffer C.M. et al. Adapting Evidence-Based Treatments for Digital Technologies: a Critical Review of Functions, Tools, and the Use of Branded Solutions. Current Psychiatry Reports, vol. 21, issue 10, article no. 106, 14 p.

97. Kosmas P., Galanakis G. et al. Enhancing accessibility in cultural heritage environments: considerations for social computing. Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 19, issue 2, 2019, pp. 471–482.

98. Puigdomenech E., Martin A. et al. Promoting healthy teenage behaviour across three European countries through the use of a novel smartphone technology platform, PEGASO fit for future: Study protocol of a quasi-experimental, controlled, multi-Centre trial. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 19, issue 1, 2019, article no. 278, pp. 1-13.

99. Nisiforou E.A., Zaphiris P. Let me play: unfolding the research landscape on ICT as a play-based tool for children with disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 19, issue 1, 2020, pp. 157-167.

100. Stuij S.M., Labrie N.H.M. et al. Developing a digital communication training tool on information-provision in oncology: Uncovering learning needs and training preferences. BMC Medical Education, vol. 18, issue 1, 2018, article no. 220, pp. 1-12.

101. Schließmann D., Nisser M. et al. Trainer in a pocket - Proof-of-concept of mobile, real-time, foot kinematics feedback for gait pattern normalization in individuals after stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury and elderly patients. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 15, issue 1, 2018, article no. 44, pp. 1-15.

102. Reinkensmeyer D.J., Blackstone S. et al. How a diverse research ecosystem has generated new rehabilitation technologies: Review of NIDILRR’s Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 14, 2017, article no. 109, pp. 1-53.

103. Castelló V., Traver V.J. et al. Assisting therapists in assessing small animal phobias by computer analysis of video-recorded sessions. Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 76, issue 20, 2017, pp. 21033-21049.

104. Santos O.C., Kravcik M., Boticario J.G. Preface to Special Issue on User Modelling to Support Personalization in Enhanced Educational Settings. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 26, issue 3, 2016, pp. 809-820.

105. Wüller H., Behrens J. et al. A scoping review of augmented reality in nursing. BMC Nursing, vol. 18, issue 1, 2019, article no. 19, pp. 1-11.

106. Alnusair A., Zhong C. et al. Context-aware multimodal recommendations of multimedia data in cyber situational awareness. Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 76, issue 21, pp. 22823-22843.

107. Powell L., Parker J., Harpin V. What is the level of evidence for the use of currently available technologies in facilitating the self-management of difficulties associated with ADHD in children and young people? A systematic review. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, vol. 27, issue 11, 2018, pp. 1391-1412.

108. Campos J.C., Abade T. et al. Don’t go in there! using the APEX framework in the design of ambient assisted living systems. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, vol. 8, issue 4, 2017, pp. 551-566.

109. Merilampi S., Koivisto A., Sirkka A. Designing serious games for special user groups—design for somebody approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 49, issue 4, pp. 646-658.

110. Terras M.M., Boyle E.A. et al. The opportunities and challenges of serious games for people with an intellectual disability. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 49, issue 4, pp. 690-700.

111. Bossavit B., Parsons S. Outcomes for design and learning when teenagers with autism codesign a serious game: A pilot study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 34, issue 3, 2018, pp. 293-305.

112. Cano A.R., Fernández-Manjón B., García-Tejedor Á.J. Using game learning analytics for validating the design of a learning game for adults with intellectual disabilities. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 49, issue 4, 2018, pp. 659-672.

113. Hodge P., Davis J. et al. StreetWise: A valid ecology for a serious game in a secure forensic mental health setting. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 63, 2015, pp, 252-259.

114. Ganzeboom M., Bakker M. et al. Speech training for neurological patients using a serious game. British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 49, issue 4, pp. 761-774.

115. Perry D., Robinson J. et al. Game design for bioinformatics and cyberinfrastructure learning: a parallel computing case study. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, vol. 22, issue 6, 2014, pp. 685-701.

116. Leroi I., Watanabe K. et al. “Psychogeritechnology” in Japan: Exemplars from a super-aged society. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, vol. 33, issue 12, pp. 1533-1540.

117. Park J., Mostafa N.A., Han H.J. “StoryWeb”: A storytelling-based knowledge-sharing application among multiple stakeholders. Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 29, issue 2, 2020, pp. 224-236.

118. Sharit J., Lisigurski M. et al. The roles of health literacy, numeracy, and graph literacy on the usability of the VA’s personal health record by veterans. Journal of Usability Studies, vol. 9, issue 4, pp. 173-193.

119. Nunes F., Verdezoto N. et al. Self-care technologies in HCI: Trends, tensions, and opportunities. ACM Trans Comput Interact, vol. 22, issue 6, 2015, article no. 38, pp. 1-40.

120. Spiel K, Frauenberger C, Keyes OS, Fitzpatrick G. Agency of autistic children in technology research - A critical literature review. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 26, issue 6, 2019, article no. 33, pp. 1-45.

121. Reynolds L.M., Davies J.P. et al. StreetWise: developing a serious game to support forensic mental health service users’ preparation for discharge: a feasibility study. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, vol. 24, issue 4, 2017, pp. 185-193.

122. Savazzi F., Isernia S. et al. Engaged in learning neurorehabilitation: Development and validation of a serious game with user-centered design. Computers & Education, vol. 125, 2018, pp. 53-61.

123. Robertson J., Macvean A. et al. Savouring our mistakes: Learning from the FitQuest project. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, vol. 16, 2018, pp. 55-67.

124. Adams A., Hart Jet al. Co-created evaluation: Identifying how games support police learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 132, 2019, pp. 34-44.

125. Rodrigues L.F., Costa C.J., Oliveira A. Gamification: A framework for designing software in e-banking. Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 62, 2016, pp. 620-634.

126. Françoise J., Bevilacqua F. Motion-sound mapping through interaction: An approach to user-centered design of auditory feedback using machine learning. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems, vol. 8, issue 2, 2018, article no. 16, pp. 1-30.

127. Kayali F., Silbernagl M. et al. Design considerations for a serious game for children after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Entertainment Computing, vol. 15, 2016, pp. 57-73.

128. Salomão R.C.S., Rebelo F., Rodríguez F.G. Defining Personas of University Students for the Development of a Digital Educational Game to Learn Portuguese as a Foreing Language. Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 3, 2015, pp. 6214-6222.

129. Ramos-Vega M.C., Palma-Morales V.M. et al. Stimulating children’s engagement with an educational serious videogame using Lean UX co-design. Entertainment Computing, vol. 38, 2020, pp. 6214-6222.

130. van der Lubbe L.M., Gerritsen C. et al. Empowering vulnerable target groups with serious games and gamification. Entertainment Computing, vol. 38, 2021, article no. 100402, pp. 1-27.

131. Bennani S., Maalel A., Ben Ghezala H. Age-learn: Ontology-based representation of personalized gamification in e-learning. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 176, 2020, pp. 1005-1014.

132. Stamm O., Dahms R., Müller-Werdan U. Virtual Reality in Pain Therapy: A Requirements Analysis for Older Adults with Chronic Back Pain. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 17, 2020, article no. 129, pp. 1-12.

133. Spil T.A.M., Romijnders V. et al. Are serious games too serious? Diffusion of wearable technologies and the creation of a diffusion of serious games model. International Journal of Information Management, vol. 58, 2021, article no. 102202, pp. 1-9.

134. Teruel M.A., Navarro E. et al. Applying thematic analysis to define an awareness interpretation for collaborative computer games. Information and Software Technology, vol. 74, 2016, pp. 17-44.

135. Bruno F., Barbieri L. et al. Virtual dives into the underwater archaeological treasures of South Italy. Virtual Reality, vol. 22, issue 2, 2018, pp. 91-102.

136. Koutsabasis P., Vosinakis S. Kinesthetic interactions in museums: conveying cultural heritage by making use of ancient tools and (re-) constructing artworks. Virtual Reality, vol. 22, issue 2, 2018, pp. 103-118.

137. Speake H., Copeland R.J. et al. Embedding Physical Activity in the Heart of the NHS: The Need for a Whole-System Approach. Sports Medicine, vol. 46, issue 7, 2016, pp. 939-946.

138. Sigala M. The application and impact of gamification funware on trip planning and experiences: the case of TripAdvisor’s funware. Electronic Markets, vol. 25, issue 3, 2015, pp. 189-209.

139. Bonet N., von Barnekow A. et al. Three-Dimensional Game-Based Cardiopulmonary Bypass Training. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, vol. 50, 2021, pp. 81-91.

140. Zhang-Kennedy L., Chiasson S. A Systematic Review of Multimedia Tools for Cybersecurity Awareness and Education. ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 54, issue 1, 2021, article no. 12, pp. 1-39.

141. Schulz R., Smaradottir B. et al. User-Centered Design of a Scenario-Based Serious Game: Game-Based Teaching of Future Healthcare. IEEE Transactions on Games, vol. 12, issue 4, 2020, pp. 376-385.

142. Agbo F.J., Oyelere S.S. et al. Co-design of mini games for learning computational. Education and Information Technologies, vol. 26, issue 5, 2021, pp.5815--5849.

143. Woolford K., Dunn S. Experimental archaeology and games: Challenges of inhabiting virtual heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, vol. 6, issue 4, 2013, article no. 16, pp. 1-15.

144. Gilbert S.B., Jang W. et al. Re-solution-Katrina edition: Moving a face-to-face game online. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 51, issue 1, 2017, pp. 356-360.

145. Wasil A.R., Venturo-Conerly K.E. et al. A review of popular smartphone apps for depression and anxiety: Assessing the inclusion of evidence-based content. Behaviour Research and Therapy, vol. 123, 2019, article no. 103498, pp. 1-9.

146. Li Q. Enactivism and teacher instructional game building: an inquiry of theory adoption and design consideration. Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 66, issue 6, 2018, pp. 1339-1358.

147. Lorenz T., Weiss A., Hirche S. Synchrony and Reciprocity: Key Mechanisms for Social Companion Robots in Therapy and Care. International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 8, issue 1, 2016, pp. 125-143.

148. Money A., Coughlan J. Team-taught versus individually taught undergraduate education: a qualitative study of student experiences and preferences. Higher Education, vol. 72, issue 6, 2016, pp. 797-811.

149. Corrêa Souza A.C., Nunes F.L.S., Delamaro M.E. An automated functional testing approach for virtual reality applications. Software Testing, Verification and Reliability, vol. 28, issue 8, 2018, article no. e1690, pp. 1-31.

150. Pyae A., Liukkonen T. et al. When Japanese elderly people play a Finnish physical exercise game: a usability study. Journal of Usability Studies, vol. 11, issue 4, 2016, pp. 131-152.

151. Konstantakis M., Caridakis G. Adding culture to UX: UX research methodologies and applications in cultural heritage. Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, vol. 13, issue 1, 2020, article no. 4, pp. 1-17.

152. Tao G., Garrett B. et al. Immersive virtual reality health games: a narrative review of game design. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 18, issue 1, 2021, article no. 31, pp. 1-21.

153. Pedraza-Hueso M., Martín-Calzón S. et al. Rehabilitation Using Kinect-based Games and Virtual Reality. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 75, 2015, pp. 161-168.

154. Fonseca D., García-Peñalvo F.J. Interactive and collaborative technological ecosystems for improving academic motivation and engagement. Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 18, issue 3, 2019, pp. 423-430.

155. Tong T., Chignell M., Sieminowski T. Case Study: A Serious Game for Neurorehabilitation Assessment. Procedia Computer Science, vol. 69, 2015, pp. 125-131.

156. Valladares-Rodriguez S., Fernández-Iglesias M.J. et al. Touchscreen games to detect cognitive impairment in senior adults. A user-interaction pilot study. International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 127, 2019, pp. 52-62.

157. Luz S., Masoodian M. et al. Using a serious game to promote community-based awareness and prevention of neglected tropical diseases. Entertainment Computing, vol. 15, 2016, pp. 43-55.

158. Hidalgo-Mazzei D., Reinares M. et al. OpenSIMPLe: A real-world implementation feasibility study of a smartphone-based psychoeducation programme for bipolar disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, vol. 241, 2018, pp. 436-445.

159. Martínez-González C.L, Camargo-Fajardo M.C.C. et al. Therapeutic Patient Education with Learning Objects Improves Asthma Control in Mexican Children. Journal of Medical Systems, vol. 44, issue 4, 2020, article no. 79, pp. 1-9.

160. Ghanbari H., Similä J., Markkula J. Utilizing online serious games to facilitate distributed requirements elicitation. Journal of Systems and Software, vol. 109, 2015, pp. 32-49.

161. de Troyer O., Janssens E. Supporting the requirement analysis phase for the development of serious games for children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, vol. 2, issue 2, 2014, pp. 76-84.

162. Sobrino-Duque R., Martínez-Rojo N. et al. Evaluating a gamification proposal for learning usability heuristics: Heureka. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 161, 2022, article no. 102774, pp. 1-15.

163. Howes S.C., Charles D. et al. User-centred design of an active computer gaming system for strength and balance exercises for older adults. Journal of Enabling Technologies, vol. 13, issue 2, 2019, pp. 101-111.

164. Harrington M.C.R. The Virtual Trillium Trail and the empirical effects of Freedom and Fidelity on discovery-based learning. Virtual Reality, vol. 16, issue 2, 2012, pp. 105-120.

165. Bontchev B., Antonova A. et al. “Let Us Save Venice”—An Educational Online Maze Game for Climate Resilience. Sustainability, vol. 14, issue 1, 2022, article no. 7, pp. 1-23.

166. Ali Z., Usman M. A framework for game engine selection for gamification and serious games. In Proc. of the 2016 Future Technologies Conference (FTC), 2016, pp. 1199-1207.

167. Zhu M., Wang A.I. Model-driven game development: A literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 52, issue 6, 2020, article no. 123, pp 1–32.

168. González Sánchez J.L., Padilla Zea N. et al. De la Usabilidad a la Jugabilidad: Diseño de Videojuegos Centrado en el Jugador. In Proc. of the IX Congreso Internacional Interacción, 2008, pp. 99-108 (in Spanish).

169. Kuznetsov M. B. UML model transformation and its application to MDA technology. Programming and Computer Software., vol. 33, issue 1, 2007, pp. 44-53, 2007 / Кузнецов М.Б. Трансформация UML-моделей и ее использование в технологии MDA. Программирование, том 33, вып. 1, 2007 г., стр. 65-79.

170. Gorshkova E.A., Novikov B.A. et al. A UML-based modeling of web application controller. Programming and Computer Software., vol. 31, issue 1, 2005, pp. 29–33 / Горшкова Е.А., Новиков Б.А. Моделирование контроллера web-приложений с использованием UML. Программирование, том 31, вып. 1, 2005 г., стр. 44-51.